I've got a real treat for everyone this week.
Over the years, I've read a lot of historical fiction/fantasy novels set in the ancient world. I've enjoyed most of them, but there is one series of books that makes me say 'Yes! That's how it's done!'
I first picked up King of Ithaca while roaming my public library's stacks looking for some new fiction. I thought the take on Odysseus' well-known story sounded intriguing, so I took it home and gave it a try.
I'm so glad I did! It's one of the best historical fantasy novels I have EVER read (and I don't say that lightly). The male and female characters were so real, the world of Mycenaean Greece so vivid, that I was just drawn into the tale. From there, I went on to devour the other books.
And now, there is a new book in the series entitled, The Oracles of Troy.
Today I'm very happy to have author Glyn Iliffe on Writing the Past to talk about history, writing, and the fantastic world of The Adventures of Odysseus.
WP: What got you interested in
historical fiction in the first place? Was it a particular book?
GI: Writing
historical fiction is just a marriage of two of my favourite things: writing
and history. I’ve wanted to be an author since primary school. Nothing else
appealed then or has since. The love of history comes from my dad. He was in
the army before I was born, but he had shelves full of books about military
history. I read these enthusiastically and it’s probably still my preferred branch
of history to this day, even ahead of ancient Greece. In my younger days I was
more a fantasy fiction fan (Tolkien and Edgar Rice Burroughs were top of my
list), but I still remember the first histfic novel I read was The Happy
Return by C S Forester. As far as characters go, Hornblower is a
masterpiece.
WP: You really bring a place to life in
your writing. Have you travelled to all the places you have written about, and
how important do you think travelling is for writing historical fiction/fantasy?
GI: I’ve travelled to
most of them - Ithaca, the Peloponnese, Mycenae, Delphi and so on - and I found
it a real help to get an understanding of the lay of the land. But it still
needs a lot of imagination to describe these places as they might have appeared
in the Bronze Age. One difficulty is that the Trojan War occurred a very long
time ago and the geography, flora, fauna and weather have changed somewhat in
the three thousand or so years since then. The great bay in front of Troy
silted up hundreds of years ago, for example. Another issue is that I’m trying
to recreate the mythological/historical world described by Homer. If you read
his descriptions of Troy you get the impression of a vast city housing many
thousands of people. He fills you with a sense of awe. The actual site of Troy,
though, is quite small and doesn’t lend much to the imagination. So I tend to
exaggerate all the towns and cities I describe to give them the glory and
majesty they would have been viewed with at the time. If I didn’t most modern
readers would be a little underwhelmed.
WP: There are so many larger-than-life
characters in the Iliad and Odyssey. What made you pick Odysseus
from among the rest?
GI: Several reasons,
all of them good. The original plan was to tell the story of the Trojan War in
its entirety, from cause to conclusion. It wasn’t intended to be a series about
one character, I just wanted to help people form a wider and deeper understanding
of the whole tapestry of myths rather than the best known elements such as
Helen of Troy, Achilles and the Trojan Horse. As with most series, though, I
needed a character to tell the story through. Odysseus was the best choice for
this. He was there when Helen was married, he was one of the key players
throughout the ten years of the war and - very importantly - Homer gives him an
epic poem all to himself for his journey home. No other character is present
for the whole thirty-year span of the Trojan myth cycle. Besides that, he’s
more complex than the likes of Agamemnon, Ajax or Achilles: a lowly king who
has to work hard to earn his place at the top table; a thinker, schemer, orator
and a warrior with more depth than some of his glory-seeking peers; a family
man driven reluctantly from his home into a war he doesn’t want to fight; a
character of dubious morality and yet somehow more humane than his
contemporaries. All in all, with his strengths and weaknesses he is much more
“modern” than the other Homeric characters, and that is key to engaging the
reader.
WP: Academia often frowns on the
popularization of history through movies, books and other media. How do you
reconcile your academic background with your writing?
GI: Greek mythology
carries a lot of baggage. On the one hand there’s a good deal of snobbery about
it. I’ve had feedback from people on Amazon who are disappointed that I don’t
take a high-brow approach to these stories. That doesn’t bother me, as I want
my books to be accessible to anyone, not just those people who love ancient
Greece. The most important thing is the story itself, and that’s where academic
criticism falls down. Like all mythology, the original tales were designed to
convey essential messages about the real world in a format that was engaging
and entertaining. If I aimed my books at the academic level I think I’d be
missing the true essence of what these myths are about.
On the other hand, I
think Hollywood approaches Greek mythology at an angle that is far too
low-brow. Clash of the Titans and the recent film about Hercules, for
example, just want to project muscles, explosions and over-the-top monsters on
to the screen. The sad thing is their multi-million dollar CG extravaganzas
completely overlook the intelligence, emotion and basic humanity of these
fantastic tales.
WP: What is your favourite historical
fiction/fantasy novel (and why)?
GI: You said
favourite, so I’m going to be honest. It has to be The Lord of the Rings.
A boring answer, I know, especially for anyone looking for a new book to read.
But it’s true. I re-read it every two or three years and I’m just drawn into a
complete fantasy world that never disappoints (except for the fact they’re too
short - after the Grey Havens I just want to keep reading).
WP: Do you envision yourself writing in Bronze
Age Greece only, or are there other periods you would like to explore? Is there
a historic person in particular whose story you would like to tell?
GI: I’m tempted by
Heracles, but maybe not for a while. The historical period I’d most like to
write about at the moment is the Great War. For much too long I’ve turned aside
from studying this vital period in history because of the common perception
that all the death and suffering was for nothing. There isn’t the same sense of
futility with the Second World War. But a couple of years ago I started to
explore the Great War a little more and now I’ve become hooked on it. Almost
all the stereotypes I knew have been exploded and to be honest I feel I’ve been
cheated for too long by modern interpretations. Worse still, I think the men
who fought that war have been cheated. What I’d like to do is write a series of
novels that attempts to honour the memory of those men and the reasons for
their sacrifice. So instead of portraying a single historical person, I’d like
to do justice to the soldiers who fought on the Western Front and perhaps
dispel some of the purely negative mythology attached to them. The problem is
that the market will be saturated with Great War novels for some time, so it
might be difficult to find a gap.
WP: Many authors struggle for years to
break out or get noticed, and from what you say on your website, you had just
such an experience. In hindsight, is there anything you would do differently?
Do you have any advice for new historical fiction/fantasy authors?
GI: Yes it took a
while. I started writing King of Ithaca in 1999 and it was rejected 38
times before I was offered a contract in 2006. It hasn’t been much easier
since, either. If I could go back to 1999 (or earlier) and give myself some
advice, I would say “have more faith”. Writers need to believe in themselves to
succeed. When sending a synopsis and sample chapters to a publisher or agent,
they’re much more likely to pay attention if the writer sounds upbeat about the
book and their own talents.
The first bit of
advice I would give any historical writer is to remember that plot should be
secondary to character. An exciting storyline can only go so far in engaging
readers; it’s more important they care about the people you’ve created if
they’re to continue to the last page. When a reader invests emotionally in your
characters then, as an author, you’ve succeeded.
Another thing is that
research is vital and takes time, but don’t feel the need to include everything
you’ve learned in your story. You should do enough to feel comfortable with the
place and era you’re describing, which will then come through in what you
write. But don’t be tempted to bog the reader down with historical facts -
leave that to the textbooks. Little details here and there should be enough to
draw the reader in without hindering the flow of your story.
WP: Do you ever see your work being made
into a movie? Who would play Odysseus and Eperitus?
GI: See my earlier
comment about Hollywood. Obviously I’d be mad to turn down a movie offer, but
judging by what has been done so far with Greek mythology I dread to think what
Hollywood would do to my characters and storyline. I would love the
books to be made into a US TV series, though. You just have to look at the
quality of The Wire, Game of Thrones and The Walking Dead
to realize the storytelling power of this medium. As for actors, that’s a tough
one. I can’t think of anyone who just fits either role. Damian Lewis is a good
actor and a natural redhead so might be an interesting choice for Odysseus. And
maybe Norman Reedus (Daryl in The Walking Dead) would be a good Eperitus
- quiet, thoughtful and mean.
WP: Do you have any writing rituals that
you would like to share? What is a typical ‘writing day’ like for you?
GI: Over the years
I’ve learned I have a writing ‘sweet spot’ that occurs in the middle of the
afternoon. I average around 2,500 words a day, most of which get written
between 2pm and 6pm. Knowing that, I usually start my writing day (which is
Friday - I have another job the other four days of the week) with a cooked
breakfast at a café in town. It’s a very old fashioned place with high
ceilings, sash windows and listed wallpaper from the 1920s, but it’s got a
great atmosphere and serves wonderful food. I usually sit there until 11am
drinking tea with a couple of friends, then head home to start the day’s
writing. It still takes me a while to get settled and one pitfall I have to
avoid is the temptation to look at e-mails, the internet or play games. It’s
always best to jump straight in - the sooner I force my brain into writing mode
the better. My worst writing days are when I haven’t had enough sleep. My best
are when I have a clear outline of what I’m going to write, so I can just slip
straight into it and let the pistons of my imagination get pumping.
WP: What is your next project?
I'd like to thank Glyn for taking the time to answer all my questions and give us some insight into his love of history and his writing life.
I highly recommend The Adventures of Odysseus! The series will inspire you, make you rage, make you cry, and make you want to get stuck in there with sword, and shield, and spear alongside all the heroes that have haunted story and myth since that long-ago war beneath the walls of Troy.
Be sure to check out Glyn's website to find out more about the series. You can also connect with him on Twitter.
His books are available on both Amazon and Kobo.
As ever, thank you for reading.
No comments:
Post a Comment